squarealexander

 

Alexander: The Director’s Cut But Not The Director’s Final Cut

image005

 

After Lawrence of Arabia but before Sex And The City: The Movie, there was another gay epic made by controversial auteur Oliver Stone.  Alexander tells the tale of Alexander The Great of Macedonia, the man who had a vision of uniting the world beneath himself.  He travels around in a walking army like those 300 guys only shouting less, killing more, and despite the fucking of dudes, being generally less gay.  Everywhere he goes he sets up another Alexandria, proving himself to be the inventor of the franchise.  There’s no little guy with a mini Starbucks empire inside of Alexander’s many Alexandrias, so I guess it must’ve been Genghis Khan or somebody years later who would invent the franchise within a franchise.

 

Alexander is continually referred to as better than his father, Philip, played by Val Kilmer.  He conquers way more than his father.  He achieves more younger than his father.  He’s better at doing an Irish accent in the Mediterranean than his father.  And because he knows to remove the baskets of snakes out the bedroom beforehand, he’s more successful at raping his own wife than his father.  However even though he’s a better rapist than his father, he’s worse at actually fathering children and dies with no heirs.

 

The film follows some of the standard swords ‘n sandals structure, only it’s really weird.  You get some scenes of the dude’s formative years.  Instead of witnessing his village getting razed or some sentimental thing that he will reflect on later in life like how Maximus in Gladiator had all those fond memories of wheat, in Alexander you get one fucked up childhood. 

 

Like a lot of busy working dads, Alexander’s father Philip struggles to maintain a relationship with his son.  He loses a bit of face with his boy when he tries to rape Alexander’s mum (Angelina Jolie) on Alexander’s bed while he’s sleeping in it but trips over a bunch of baskets of snakes.  He tries to make up for it by taking over storytime duties, but the stories are all really gorey and the illustrations are painted on walls in a dark underground cavern and none of them are pop-up or scratch ‘n sniff.

 

Alexander does still grow up to be a tough ruler like his father, but he’s a bad motherfucker more in the Oedipus way than the John Shaft way.  His mother, who does not age, manages to manipulate him his whole life, even over the telephone or something when Alexander goes as far as India.

 

The film shows Alexander’s great ambition of a united world taking him very far.  He grows a blonde mullet and eventually his ego and the egos of his posse cause his whole venture to collapse.  We are clearly supposed to see parallels with other historical figures such as David Lee Roth.  But this film concerns itself with other strange things.  We get standard battle scenes, but Stone puts weird spins on them.  There’s the big moment where you know a Braveheartian speech is coming to rouse the army he’s gathered for a battle.  But then Alexander starts speaking in a normal speaking voice and giving each soldier an individual performance review before the battle.  Then he finally does start speaking more loudly and addressing the group as a whole and Stone does funny things.  Stone actually lets you know what it would be like to be the guy at the back of the crowd who can barely hear the speech. 

 

Then Stone goes all Terrence Mallek and asks the question: what would a hawk think of all this?  We cut to a CGI hawk flying around watching the war.  I know a lot of you ornithologists have wondered what a hawk would think about a gay Greek gay with a blonde mullet and an Irish accent conquering lands for the sheer sense of achievement.  Unfortunately, the hawk does not get a narration track.  Presumably it is hoping that the battle will produce a black car for him to shit on, which is perhaps the greatest truth of war.

 

Stone also hasn’t learned any new music video tricks since he put Natural Born Killers through the Avid blender almost twenty years ago.  He stills thinks filters and tinting have some sort of intense meaning.  He does that thing where when a guy is speaking he will cut to an extended shot of the guy with his mouth closed but leave the audio of his voice flowing to show that ambition makes ventriloquists of us all.  I wonder just how much time in the audition process Stone allots for constipated grimaces.

 

I’m not really sure how much of an overall vision Oliver Stone had for this film.  This cut I watched was called The Director’s Cut, different from the theatrical cut, but then there was another cut after that called Revisited: The Final Cut.  Which makes me think he just didn’t have a clear idea of what he wanted while he was making it.  He clearly forgot to send out a memo to the cast about what he was going for with the accents and so all the actors just drew their own conclusions.  Christopher Plummer and Anthony Hopkins do the standard Shakespeare-in-the-park Britishy voice we’re used to in this sort of thing.  Farrell opts to keep his native Irish accent and Kilmer kinda follows his lead doing a bit of lilt as well.  Rosario Dawson tries to do some sort of accent (?).  Angelina Jolie uses this part to audition for Cate Blanchett’s role in Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull.  I’m not sure if Jared Leto is trying to sound English or just dainty.  If you put Kevin Costner in here it would probably start an accent tornado that would destroy the set.

 

I will give the movie studios credit for pouring what looks like a lot of money into an openly gay epic.  And this film does make a good case for gays in the military.  Especially when all the straight guys with wives back home start whining that they need to go home and see their ladies again.  An army the screws together won’t lose together! (that rhymes!)  Some people complained that there were no man-on-man love scenes, but we didn’t need to see Judah Ben-Hur on screen blowing his load in a lady to know he was straight, so I don’t see why we need shit that explicit here.  I mean, he declares his love for a man as “the one true love of his life”, he hugs and kisses men, his mother comments on how he prefers boys to girls, he surrounds himself with a posse of dainty prettymen like Jared Leto and Jonathan Reesemakers who all lounge about wearing no pants.  Sorry if not seeing his erect cock go in another dude’s mouth kept this whole thing a little too vague for some people but I think this movie is as clearly gay as you can get.

 

The film ends up being about a guy who achieved something extraordinary but for no real reason other than for the sake of doing it.  Alexander’s path is like in Star Trek 5: The Final Frontier, when Captain Kirk says that he climbs a mountain “because it is there” and then a fucked-up movie ensues.  Alexander The Great’s example would inspire other historical figures with more of a sense of purpose, such as Adrian Veidt.  I got a fair bit of enjoyment out of the sheer what-the-fuck factor in this film, but I wouldn’t really watch it again or bother to investigate other cuts of this film.  And I really think the hawk should’ve talked.

 

image005

 

If you liked this, here are some other recommended readings:

 

square300300

It’s a lot of guys.  Is it a lot of movie? You bet you bottom three hundred dollars it is!

 

 

 

squarebraveheartMel Gibson’s Braveheart

This guy is sorta like Bourne, but with friends.

 

 

 

squaredebsDEBS: They’re Crime-Fighting Hotties with Killer Bodies

May the Jordanafication and Brewsterization of Hollywood continue.

 

 

 

image005